Geoengineering, weather modification, climate remediation, climate change, global warming—or whatever the science and corporate spinners are calling it this week.

Here I’ll be posting links and pics, quoting/reviewing books and articles, and including commentary about this crucial and controversial topic, while trying to cut through some of the propaganda of my favorite “conspiracy theory” subject: The Weather.

Our own skies provide a regular crop of evidence for the on-going atmospheric manipulations.  The Texas Weather Modification Association provides zero assistance to the public though we are personally experiencing all the signature signs of geoengineering, which they pretend is not happening: drought-deluge within micro-regions of the county, tornadoes, weather whiplash, monster hail, high prolonged heat, and even snow storms.  

The news reporters normalize, the relevant agencies deny, the public largely ignores this obvious crime against humanity.  No one should be manipulating the weather as far as I’m concerned.  The fact that it’s been happening mostly under the public’s radar for over 70 years is mind boggling and insane, but totally DOCUMENTED!

I’ve been documenting these instances for many years on this blog as the establishment continues their normalization attempts. 

(For newer posts, please keep scrolling)

https://kenshohomestead.org/2020/12/01/weather-warfare-worldwide/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2020/03/02/weather-modification-info-flows/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2020/01/19/fp-mag-shilling-for-climate-gate/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2020/01/13/weather-modification-matters-2/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2019/09/21/weather-modification-matters/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2019/09/26/weather-modification-matters-ii/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2019/09/30/weather-modification-matters-iii/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2019/09/17/climate-hysteria-agenda-2030/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2019/07/14/stop-the-madness/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2018/11/17/fake-clouds-fake-weather/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2016/12/09/geoengineering-weather-modification-and-weaponizing-nature/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2017/02/08/part-12-upside-down-world/

We start with a couple of primers from the amazing sites and research of Jim Lee.

Disclaimer: I’ve cherry-picked quotes I like from this excellent and well-researched article (though rather dated) and I would recommend a complete reading. However, politically, the final paragraphs I find off-putting, short-sighted and propaganda-driven.  I did not find this to deter from the substance of the main thesis, so I include it here.

The Age of Geoengineering: Breaking the Sorcerer’s Spell (OGE LAUNCH) – Vermont Independent

Directly from the Article:

“One purpose of this essay is therefore perhaps unavoidably therapeutic: I wish to help promote an integration of two scientific communities, or more precisely, to persuade the cheery Dr. Jekyll to recognize his alter ego, the dark and mysterious Mr. Hyde, and to do so within plain sight of the entire global climate-change science and activist community. Why? Because until this self-reckoning happens no good will come of Dr. Jekyll’s supposedly benign schemes to deal with Earth’s climate. The clever and above all determined Mr. Hyde, an inveterate national security warrior, will use such schemes for his own anachronistic national security ends. He always has. And history demonstrates these ends do not servethe benefit of all humanity.

The dawn of the Age of Geoengineering: The Sorcerer’s apprentices at play

During WW II “a revolution took place, one that was initiated and sustained not so much by the military as by science,” according to historian Kathleen Williams. Immediately after the war, “Military stimulation of science and technology became institutionalized” and the “Cold War ensured the military funding of science would continue…changing both academic science and the military.”[12]Sixty years ago the writer Robert Jungk noted: “In the universities, once homes of free speech throughout the world, the spirit of secrecy took possession.”[13]The Department of Defense (DoD) alone has accounted for “nearly 70 percent of all government funds directed towards research and development” of basic scientific knowledge.[14]The 350-year tradition of independent, individual investigation of nature and matter gave way to the era of ‘Big Science’, meaning scientific research with big, government-funded budgets. Big Science unequivocally included weather and climate modification, as well as other forms of geoengineering, all of which have been invariably cloaked in secrecy. And “secrecy always lowers the standard of environmental accountability”[15]— not to mention democratic accountability.

Earth’s atmosphere consists of several layers, each significantly related to the other, from the lowest layer, the troposphere, where the air we breathe and the weather we experience occurs, to the stratosphere, which also holds the ozone layer, to the mesosphere, the thermosphere, and finally the exosphere, which shades into outer space. The ionosphere stretches from the mesosphere through the thermosphere and into the lower reaches of the exosphere, from 31 to 621 miles above Earth. It was this region that drew the military’s fiery curiosity: how could it be influenced, what were its secrets, and powers?

After Argus, Starfish, and West Ford, research on the ionosphere proceeded apace with construction of a worldwide network of radio frequency transmitters, and later ionospheric heaters, in the US, Canada, Norway, Greenland, Australia, Puerto Rico, and Peru, in partnership with what the National Academy of Sciences calls the “ionospheric modification (IM) community”[35]of major research universities and institutes working in cooperation with the Pentagon. Research also continued in the Soviet Union. “Atmospheric modification experiments,” Dr. Bertell informs us, “can be categorized as either chemical [aerosols] or wave [electromagnetic] related.”[36]The ionosphere is an “active electrical shield protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy particles from space” and probing it with radio waves has led to the understanding that a “strong electrical coupling exists between the ionosphere and the lower atmosphere.”[37]IM community research has led to many discoveries useful to the military for global over-the-horizon communications, earth-penetrating tomography (also useful to fossil-fuel and other mining companies), surveillance, and weather or climate modification, among other purposes.[38]

Ever since the early days of Project Cirrus weather modification has been both weaponized and commercialized. Since the early 1970s over sixty countries[43]and most US western states have used weather modification technology to manipulate their weather, programs that almost certainly have had and continue to have an as yet unspecified effect on the planet’s overall climate. One region’s or one country’s drought becomes another’s flood, and one’s rain, a neighbor’s drought. The artificial weather seamlessly becomes the artificial climate. Thousands of regional weather modifications made over the past 65 years, such as the UK’s Project Cumulus (1949–1955)[44]and the US’s Project Skywater (1961–1988),[45]have collectively impacted the world’s meteorological and hydrological cycles in ways that remain largely unclarifiedand ignored by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, and IPCC climate modelers.

In the 1950s and early 1960s climate change geoengineering proposals in both the US and Soviet Union were oriented toward causing global warming for the benefit of human activity, with the melting of the Arctic then the glittering jewel on the geoengineer’s horizon, and a prospect devoutly hoped for by Soviet geoengineers and planners.[60](One fifth of Russia’s territory lies north of the Arctic Circle and includes an Arctic-frontier coastline thousands of miles long.) This original or early orientation of geoscientists has been quietly maintained for decades despite the ever-growing consensus about global warming, and has been funded by the big energy companies who have been wedged inside the great climate change debate since its inception.[61]In a March 25, 2012 letter to The EconomistMatt Andersson, an aerospace executive and intelligence industry consultant, bluntly stated: “The public and press are largely uninformed (and misled) as to the actual Geo-engineering operations being conducted by military and certain cooperating commercial interests to effectively ‘melt’ the arctic for naval navigation and resource extraction.”[62]

The pioneering journalists who covered the early chemtrails story from 1999 to 2005 also reported that individual citizens collected post-spray rainwater samples and had them tested by independent laboratories in several countries throughout the Western world. These tests showed elevated levels of aluminum and barium most frequently, but also many other toxic elements such as strontium, thorium, copper, titanium, arsenic, lithium, boron, iron, sodium, calcium, lead, selenium, magnesium, chromium, and cadmium, among others as well as strange gels, polymers, and a variety of microorganisms. Post-spray rainwater tests have been conducted throughout the world, most commonly in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.[97]

In the decades since the Vietnam War the state’s and corporate media’s appropriation of the term “conspiracy theorist” has cast a pall over the search for truth about the exercise of power, and especially the state’s covert exercise of its military, intelligence, and technological prowess. This has profoundly colored the search for answers about the military’s ongoing geoengineering activities because secret operations are classified, hence unprovable by standard criteria, and thus remain invisible to the public. Accusations that cannot be verified because of classified information can be safely dismissed withplausibledenial. The doctrine of plausible deniability was specifically adopted by the US government at the outset of the Cold War in 1948: “‘covert operations’ are understood to be all activities…so planned and executed that any US Government responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons and that if uncovered the US Government can plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them.”[112]

The Russian physicist and Nobel laureate Peter Kapitsa wrote of the change that came over science on the eve of WW II: “[T]he happy days of free scientific work…disappeared forever” and science “lost her freedom. She has become a productive force. She has become rich, but she has become enslaved” to governments, war, and commerce, and she is “veiled in secrecy.”[229]After the war diverse writers could claim that science had become, in the words of historian James Fleming, “a prominent and permanent part of all modern militaries,” and that the links between them “in perspectives, personnel, values, budgets, [and] scale…have grown inexorably over the years” with a consequent “militarization of the natural world.”[230]

Science’s “loss” of a “deeply rooted set of ethical beliefs”[231]was compensated by a vast increase in scientists’ social status and political power: “[T]here broods over them a mythological identity” that serves to ensure them a “supremacy within our culture,” and “envisages them as the new Prometheus pitted against the hostile forces of nature,”[232]uniquely serving humanity. Roszak asks if science is “to be pardoned on the grounds it has that it has systematically taught our society to regard knowledge as a thing apart from wisdom.” Such “alienated knowing is, sooner or later, ecologically disastrous knowing.”[233]

And now, back to our East Texas property: Giant hail and freak snowstorms

“Geoengineering, weather modification, climate remediation, space weather, pluviculture, cloud seeding, stratospheric aerosol injections, ionospheric heaters, marine cloud whitening, contrail-induced cirrus (aka—the infamous ‘chemtrail’ conspiracy theory).” Read more: Kensho Post Dec. 1, 2020

For those on the U.S. West Coast in particular One Pacific Redwood YouTube channel has lots of information and weather reports.

One Pacific Redwood YT

There are those, including the above, who discredit the work of Dane Wigington of GeoengineeringWatch.org

I don’t have the answers and I don’t know which information is correct or who to trust. However, Dane is the most prolific of those speaking out against geo-engineering/weather modification, so I regularly follow his work. His documentary ‘The Dimming’ is very informative and I hope everyone will watch it.

“Dr. Joseph Kaplan (1902-1991), chairman of the International Geophysical Year, said, “Control of earth’s weather and temperature is within the realm of practicability now.” ~ ~ ~ High-profile weather modifier Archie Kahan pointed towards future large-scale weather control by stating, “Changes in the atmospheric circulation produced by modifying the radiation balance of the atmosphere and control of major storms are possibilities held”

— Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project: second edition by Peter Kirby
“phenomenon central to the New Manhattan Project and explained in the next chapter. He writes, “There is reason to believe that we can find triggering mechanisms which could make or dissipate atmospheric disturbances.””

— Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project: second edition by Peter Kirby
https://a.co/axJPWWP
“Charles E. Jones III is a retired US Air Force brigadier general who served continuously in the Air Force and Air Force Reserve from 1954 to 1986. He has written a short piece acknowledging the reality of chemtrails. Jones writes: “When people look up into the blue and see white trails paralleling and criss-crossing high in the sky little do they know that they are not seeing aircraft engine contrails, but instead they are witnessing a man made climate engineering crisis”

— Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project: second edition by Peter Kirby
https://a.co/deNHbci
“facing all air breathing humans and animals on planet Earth. These white aircraft spray trails consist of scientifically verifiable spraying of aluminum particles and other toxic heavy metals, polymers, and chemical components. Toxic atmospheric aerosols used to alter weather patterns, creating droughts in some regions, deluges and floods in other locations and even extreme cold under other conditions.””

— Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project: second edition by Peter Kirby
https://a.co/deNHbci
“LORAN/ SS Loran Today, electromagnetic energy generated from ground-based antennas called ‘ionospheric heaters’ as well as their offspring is used to manipulate the atmosphere and thereby modify the weather. As noted in the first chapter, this use of electromagnetic energy is what distinguishes the New Manhattan Project from the conventional cloud-seeding industry. The biggest early developments of technologies which have since resulted in today’s ionospheric heaters took place at the MIT Rad Lab. Ionospheric heaters have evolved from something developed at the Rad Lab called the Long Range Navigation (LORAN) system. During the Rad Lab years with LORAN, Big Science got serious about bouncing radio waves off of the ionosphere. Before LORAN, the most significant contributions in this area were made by Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) and Guglielmo Marconi (1874-1937), and then later by scientists Gregory Breit (1899-1981) and Merle Tuve (1901-1982). Merle Tuve was the director of the terrestrial magnetism division of the Carnegie Institution.”

— Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project: second edition by Peter Kirby

“Teller wrote and spoke about weather modification countless times. In his memoirs, Teller writes of, “putting 1 billion small floating spheres into the atmosphere.” We have noted how he wrote about spraying us with aluminum. In his book “The Legacy of Hiroshima he suggests the solar radiation management (SRM) geoengineering thesis. In other words, he suggested spraying us with chemtrails many times. Teller served on the Panel on Weather and Climate Modification of the National Academy of Sciences where our good friend Gordon J.F. MacDonald was chairman. Teller once testified before the Senate Military Preparedness Committee that if Russia was first to control the weather on a global scale, then the United States could be beaten without war. Teller also told the committee that he wouldn’t be surprised if the Russians achieved global weather control in the relatively near future. Throughout his career, Teller used the Russian threat as a justification for more spending on weapons programs. In the example reproduced next, we see how Teller notes atmospheric ‘triggers.’ He’s writing about the notion that certain, relatively small atmospheric phenomena at certain points in space and time can create atmospheric chain reactions which eventually lead to large atmospheric phenomena such as storms. It is analogous to the so-called ‘butterfly effect.’ The butterfly effect is the notion that the flapping of a butterfly’s wings in China can eventually cause a giant storm on Cape Cod. The thesis of atmospheric triggers is mentioned over and over again throughout”

See the Geoengineering-Weather Modification Playlist at YT channel NeverLoseTruth

“the weather modification literature in the same way Teller mentions it here. In order to control the weather, Teller and his peers suggested that these triggers be artificially created and/ or manipulated. The atmospheric trigger thesis is central to today’s NMP operations. In fact, it was during the course of his work in computer-simulated weather models when American mathematician Edward Lorenz coined the phrase and wrote about it in his paper “Predictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly’s Wings in Brazil Set Off a Tornado in Texas?” Today’s NMP supercomputer atmospheric modeling systems are designed to be able to identify these triggers and predict their outcomes. Knowing the probable outcomes is how the people running the NMP know when and where to perform atmospheric manipulations. The National laboratory Teller co-founded and directed (Lawrence Livermore National Labs) has been at the forefront of supercomputer atmospheric modeling since early on and continues there today. Teller writes: “Before anything can be controlled, it first must be understood. We are just beginning to approach an understanding of weather. We know that very small causes can grow into very big effects. A slight disturbance of the air masses on the front separating the calm air of the poles from the steady westerly winds encircling the globe in temperate latitudes can trigger a whirlpool a thousand miles wide and can affect the weather over the United States for an entire week. We can and we should increase the number and range of our weather observations. We will use satellites and other means to keep track of clouds and winds. Then, using improved electronic computers, we shall be able to predict weather and trace the origin of each development back to its original trigger. “When this high degree of meteorological understanding has been attained, we might be able to create triggers of our own and realize the age-old dream of actually doing something about the weather. We might spread a cloud of dust over a strategic location [author’s emphasis] or find some other way to upset the temperature balance between air masses. We might break droughts. We might regulate the precise location and time where a hurricane arises, thus predetermining the place where the destructive winds would dissipate. “Such new command over nature will give us responsibilities beyond our present ability to imagine. When rain will be the servant of man, man must be the master of himself. Control of clouds will bring either conflict or co-operation between nations. The prospect may seem terrifying, but in the long run this situation or one similar to it will surely arise. Science brings progress; progress creates power;”

Some photos after a tornado on our property that came without warning in the middle of the night and was not recorded by any source I could find. It was terrifying and killed dozens of mature trees, nearly took the roof off the house and spread limbs, branches and debris right up to every window and across all our acreage.

Tornadoes were never a regular occurrence in East Texas, now we have multiple events every year somewhere nearby.

Through fence lines and trails, the clean up took months and the damage is still visible over three years later.

Here are a couple of videos I took of the leveling of the forest during another freak ‘tornado’ nearby, at Weeping Mary/Caddo Mounds, that also came without warning and during a Native American ceremony in the middle of the day.

And once again, back to our East Texas property.

These ‘upside down icicles’ formed in the still green grass overnight when the temperature dropped 50 degrees.

Geoengineering, Weather Warfare, Directed Energy Weapons

5 October 2024 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | US Patent 11762126B2 |

Abstract

“Surface modification control stations and methods in a globally distributed array for dynamically adjusting the atmospheric, terrestrial and oceanic properties. The control stations modify the humidity, currents, wind flows and heat removal rate of the surface and facilitate cooling and control of large area of global surface temperatures. This global system is made of arrays of multiple sub-systems that monitor climate and act locally on weather with dynamically generated local forcing & perturbations for guiding in a controlled manner aim at long-term modifications. The machineries are part of a large-scale system consisting of an array of many such machines put across the globe at locations called the control stations. These are then used in a coordinated manner to modify large area weather and the global climate as desired.”

US Patent 11762126 Surface modification control stations and methods in a globally distributed array for dynamically adjusting the atmospheric terrestrial and oceanic properties

“Directed Energy Weapons on battlefield: A new vision for 2025” written by John P. Geis II, Lieutenant Colonel United States Air Force (UASF)

Title: Future of Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) and its impact on future warfare from the perspective of great powers | Hassan Abbasi – Academia.edu

“…atmospheric aerosols affect many aspects of human health and the environment. Aerosol mass and its toxic chemical components are known to have links to chronic respiratory and acute cardio-vascular problems. Aerosols are also closely linked to problems of visibility reduction, acid rain, and urban smog in many locations of the world.”

WMO Aerosol Global Atmosphere Watch

United Nations WMO Weather Research Plan 2024-2027

A few more pics of our recent sky on the homestead and in the local vicinity, November 2024

The angular-shaped, spreading, cobweb-like, highly reflective ‘clouds’ are the result of the ‘ionization’ of the atmosphere, that is, the ‘electrification’ using dispersed chemical layers of particulates of heavy metals and other toxic substances.

Dane Wigington continues to discuss it weekly, for over a decade, on his ‘bad news broadcast’

Radiation: A Central Component of Weather Control

30 September 2024 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Microwave radiation is utilized for weather experimentation and forecasting.

Did you know radiation is a central component of weather control?

At the heart of weather experimentation is NEXRAD, or NEXt-generation RADar and the transmission of microwave radiation pollution.

The cell phone you hold in your hand and the cell phone towers it’s communicating with are transmitting and receiving microwave radiation.

Shown below, definitions of pollution and pollutants from Verizon and AT&T