GEO-ENGINEERING: ‘There Has Been No Completely Natural Weather For Decades’ – By Joseph P. Farrell, Ph.D — RIELPOLITIK

Source – gizadeathstar.com – “…What that use means is that in effect there has been no completely “natural” weather for decades. Every system is either deliberately engineered and steered, or is blowback to some degree of such engineering, and hence even in that sense a product of it. That is a very uncomfortable conclusion to […]

via GEO-ENGINEERING: ‘There Has Been No Completely Natural Weather For Decades’ – By Joseph P. Farrell, Ph.D — RIELPOLITIK

FP Mag: Shilling for Climate Gate

The biggest of Globalist media shill groups, Foreign Policy magazine, spins another climate catastrophe piece shaming Australian ‘right-wing’ pundits for denying climate change despite public outcries, flawless consensus on climate science, and clearly crazy conspiracy theories.

The tone of their latest propaganda hit-piece (“Australians Are Ready to Break Out of the Cycle of Climate Change Denial”) is summed up nicely in one of  many ridiculous statements:  “Hopefully, it means denying mainstream climate science is treated as it should be: more like the actively harmful anti-vaccination movement than the merely quirky flat Earth movement.”

Does the article provide science data?  Of course not.  Does it link to climate studies? Nope.  Does it offer a list of scientists who conform to this global consensus?  Indeed, it does not.  Does it give even a slightly balanced approach to the various sides of the highly complex argument?  Not even remotely.

Does it provide any material or research on how Geoengineering/weather modification work?

Does it discuss 70+ years of weather modification?  The global public-private partnerships using geoengineering to steer the atmospheric rivers?  Perhaps it mentions the cloud seeding technology that would stop or prevent such widespread fire catastrophes?  Or maybe the poor stewardship of their government in not allowing farmers and ranchers to properly manage their land with controlled burns? Or the diversion and sale of their water to foreign corporations?

Of course not!  None of these crucial issues are mentioned, because the public is not supposed to know about them, consider them, or question anything.  The media is not supposed to research them, because they are mouthpieces of the elite establishment who are waging weather warfare around the globe in order to get the public to fall into lockstep with their Full-spectrum dominance agenda.

ED403A5A-AE1C-4566-9AF1-E1AE5A295BF6

Foreign Policy magazine demonstrates its pathetic, shill-driven, so-called journalism once again.

Weather Modification Matters

There’s a baffling disconnect between the world of science and mainstream society.  How many folks don’t realize weather modification ‘is A thing’ as the modern parlance goes.  It’s been a thing FOREVER!  It’s an enormous field of research and EXPERIMENTATION with its own conferences, journals, corporations, market speculations, and the usual establishment lies and manipulations that go with that crucial institutionalized status.

From the current President of the Journal of Weather Modification, who recently celebrated their 50th Anniversary:

“Another goal of mine was to increase the membership of the international community. This issue is still a work in progress, but with the help of some of our more prominent international members, I hope the tide will turn. Weather Modification IS an international activity and is ongoing across the globe in terms of operations projects and research. My hope, is that the international weather modification community is as equally as curious about the WMA as we are about them!”

Governments around the world don’t know about this thriving global industry?  The Australian government currently can’t find the technological or financial resources to cloud seed over their devastating fires?  The U.S. government isn’t benefitting from any of the myriad technologies for causing floods, droughts, tornadoes, hail, or prevention of such weather chaos?

According to the Journal of Environmental Management 

“Science communication is needed to inform risk perception and action of stakeholders”

And are we not all STAKEHOLDERS when it comes to our environment?

 

The American Love Affair With War — Keeping It Unreal

Mark Twain, who said so many memorable things, noted that “God created war so that Americans would learn geography.” (He also said, “Everyone complains about the weather, but no one ever does anything about it.” This, long after weather modification experiments were all the rage, but just a side note, from little ole me.)

“Donald Trump’s recent assassination of Iranian Maj. General Qassem Soleimani was not an exceptional act of madness by a deranged president. It was instead the continuation of a long, unfortunate American tradition. Military aggressiveness has been a feature of U.S. foreign policy for a very long time. As I detail in my book Crimes and Cover-Ups […]”

via The American Love Affair With War — Keeping It Unreal

 

Weather Control through Nanotechnology

Jon Storrs Hall:  Meet one of the many crazy technocrats who LOVE the power of weather as a weapon.  And there’s a mass of minions who can’t wait to support them all.

https://vimeo.com/2539563

Here’s a thought!  Why don’t you use all that technology to actually help people?

Let me guess, because we the people are your targets?

 

“In the cybernetic age, the individual becomes increasingly subject to manipulation. His work, his consumption, and his leisure are manipulated by advertising, by ideologies, by what Skinner calls “positive reinforcements.” The individuals loses his active, responsible role in the social process; he becomes completely “adjusted” and learns that any behavior, act, thought, or feeling which does not fit into the general scheme puts him at a severe disadvantage; in fact he is what he is supposed to be…What has happened in modern industrial society is that traditions, and common values, and genuine social personal ties with others have largely disappeared. The modern mass man is isolated and lonely, even though he is part of a crowd; he has no convictions which he could share with others, only slogans and ideologies he gets from the communications media.” – Erich Fromm (The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness)

The Tyranny Of Niceness

It’s invading even my preferred forums.  “We’re polite here,” says the moderator, who boasts constantly about his ‘free-speech’ platform.  I’m reminded of my grandmother, bless her heart, “If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all.”

If I can’t say it, can I show it?  Maybe with a photo or a painting or a poem?

332B1BC0-84C7-4AF3-BCD4-76EAA351D940
Jan Saudek, Czech painter, photographer, hand-painted photos, pre Photoshop

Really? Are we not adults? Must every passionate reproach come with milk and cookies lest you soil yourself with fear? Must your poetic weakness control even my righteous indignation?  Have you ever wondered why you’re so afraid, as you pretend you’re surrounded by love?

Shame, guilt, coercion, all erode free speech just as much as shadow banning.  As do the ubiquitous ‘community guidelines’ and the silencing, the ostracizing and ‘casting out’ of uncomfortable or critical viewpoints.  Funny thing is, the very ones who complain about this the most, then seem to pile it on at the very same time!

“The iron hand that crushed the tyrant’s head became the tyrant in its stead.” William Blake

Perhaps he’d be inclined today to add something like: “The velvet glove that chokes the angry voice hides a martyr in her garter.”

Like laws, these ‘guidelines’ are selective, what makes one guilty in one situation is not universally applied to another’s whose infraction yielded results beneficial, albeit perhaps even criminal, to the Alpha myth-maker’s agenda.  

It all comes complete with fake feel-good language and unspoken devotion to conformity to tribe norms.  Enforcing conformity through indirect aggression, as demonstrated through  Phyllis Chesler’s controversial book “Woman’s Inhumanity to Woman” or the ultra-feminization of culture, as explored through Michael Tsarion’s work on the malignant feminine we can see exactly how the Globalists and their ilk continue to successfully cast their sticky net today.

https://www.usda.gov/oce/sustainable/

https://www.garydbarnett.com/the-technocratic-state-is-the-mortal-enemy-of-the-individual/

What’s unspoken, and unallowable, are questioning the underlying assumptions. “Sustainable to what/whom, exactly?”

“Efficient and effective by what standards?” 

They are so seduced by the image of virtue they’ve lost touch with what virtue actually is.  It’s not pretending evil does not exist.  It’s not turning a blind eye. It’s not transforming dissociation into a gift.  And it’s certainly not handing over all sovereignty to supposed ‘experts’ and ‘authorities’— the scourge of our modern-day adultism.  

If I pretend it’s love, it is love.  If I pretend it’s justice, it is justice.  If I slap a happy slogan on it, paint a rainbow over it, it’s fixed.

Jon Rappoport, When Virtue is the Greatest Crime

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/01/02/when-virtue-is-greatest-crime/

“They are the counter-revolution that has been building in this country for over a hundred years. It is being managed from elite platforms, and its goal is the destruction of every shred of the original ideas on which this country was founded. Destruction in fact, in thought, in action, and in memory. Wipe out the memory of…Individual freedom…And what freedom implies. Wipe out self. Replace it with an all-embracing societal machine dedicated to love.”

Set the next generation up for total compliance, blind obedience to authority, and we’ll call that love and care.

Love, as in complete lack of discernment, devoid of honesty or truth, beyond accountability, and we’ll call this perfect love, ultimate love, unconditional love. Before you know it, the abused will apply this to the tyrannical state as they did to the tyrannical family.

Except, that it has lots of undisclosed conditions.  Like, the tyranny of niceness and conformity.  If you make her uncomfortable, the rules change. If you require accountability, the goal post shifts. 

If you point out her highly conditional love, you see swiftly and clearly the real elephant in the room.

“After ten years in the field, I have had many prosecutors tell me that they prefer to not have women on their juries because women will not identify with the woman survivor, as a psychological means of reassuring themselves that nothing so horrendous could ever happen to them.  Women either believe that the raped woman did something wrong that “allowed” the rape to happen—or that what happened was not rape.  Either way, they themselves remain out of the Possible Victim category in their minds.” 

1EF20527-F0C4-42A9-9080-26BCBEF1E38E