I’m not sure what to make of it, but I’m sharing this quickie just the same.
A gorgeous day of new life, new moves, and what feels like genuinely natural weather for a change.
First rose, first poppy, first lamb and the kittens come out to play. 🤗
And, I expect Geoengineering/weather modification has hit the popular charts, at last, yay!
I will admit I thought this very popular channel must be shills of some sort, because they seemed to be completely avoiding the obvious weather warfare for years now.
Be that as it may, they’ve been clueing in more and more lately, and now, I consider their cherry popped. It’s about time! I don’t know what to make of it exactly, but I do believe in the gaming world it means we’ve just leveled up.
Kensho Homestead 
Looks like your “guard” dog is on the J-O-B!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Guarding the poppy fields! 😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing!
Wow, 3545 comments in 11 hours.
I’ve watched “The Dimming”, but that Brennan/CFR clip was new to me. Any idea when Brennan gave that speech? I thought it was interesting that he was promoting ‘climate change’ in a speech presented at the CFR! (Or was it given somewhere else, and they were just using the CFR backdrop?)
We’ve had 2 days now with very little spraying here, but they crisscrossed the skies here Saturday afternoon, and I saw a little bit Sunday afternoon (couldn’t they have used some Easter Egg dye on Sunday? lol.)
If the report from the NTP on fluoride harm is ever released, and more importantly acted upon in a positive way, I suspect that will be another toxin they will add to their spraying lineup. They’ve gotta get rid of it somehow, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I remember where I originally saw that Brennan clip, will check later if it’s still there and get back to you. So true, about the fluoride, they’d just put it somewhere else and tell us how healthy it is for our lungs, or joints, or some nonsense. (If they’re taking requests I’d like our spray to include laughing gas, like at the dentist, lol!)
While the spraying does make it very hot here, I think it’s also the ionospheric heaters that cause the pressure variants and the feeling of being in a microwave—heating from the inside out. Like, when it’s completely overcast overnight, but the heat shoots up—so unnatural, feels so oppressive.
LikeLike
Thanks for finding the date, etc! So, almost 7 years ago. Isn’t it amazing how ‘unenlightened’ CFR members were back then. Heck, I’ve got “What in the world are they spraying?” and “Why in the world are they spraying?” (G. Edward Griffin) from waaay back. But I guess that’s the cover: ‘it’s a novel idea, one we should explore, and work on some issues’, when they’ve been doing it for how long??
I agree with the ionospheric heaters being used. I don’t see how dropping particles and relying on gravity and wind currents alone could accomplish the weather front modifications some have shown. (And if the purpose really was to reflect solar energy, why not just blanket the sky instead of the usual grid-like patterns we see?)
I think there has to be a mechanical energy tool being used. Could the sprayed particles act as a sort of energy collector/concentrator, as well as being a marking/tracking tool, similar to contrast (dye) being used in vascular medical procedures? Don’t ask that question to anyone at the CFR…they’re too worried about raising enough money to replace all the polar bear’s melting igloos.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That sounds like some great questions and speculations. I definitely think there is mapping going on of the ‘atmospheric rivers’. I think the heavy metal particulates act like miniature magnets, like iron shavings that can then be pulled/pushed/steered. I don’t think they can sell it to the United Nations or the general public unless they push it as ‘global climate remediation’ tech, too much liability in weather modification. Once it’s ‘accepted’ they will skirt around the laws and liability like with the vaccines.
There is one channel I like who talks about the fake clouds being formed by nanobots. This is a really interesting hypothesis b/c she shows it happening on radar, as they ‘blow up’, or rather, self-replicate. Have you heard of this? Seems very plausible to me.
LikeLike
Mini-magnets…I like that. You know, they could push it on the UN if they just said they were putting vaccines in the mix…with nano particles. Didn’t Stephers make mention of something like that in one of her POM posts? (Maybe I dreamed it, but I thought I had seen other posts/articles mentioning aerosolized vaccines being deployed.)
No, haven’t heard about nanobots in clouds, but I guess that anything is possible and/or plausible. And nothing ‘they’ do is really surprising anymore. Sad.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t think you dreamed it—think that has been proposed along with vaccines in the food. Yes, sad.
LikeLike
Not exactly aerosolized vaccines, but in the same ‘creep zone’ for sure—nano-devices, using melanin, in the food. https://wrenchinthegears.com/2023/04/13/electric-philadelphia-politcs-with-a-side-of-alchemy-and-astrology/
See graphic “edible electronics powered by melanin”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Speech to CFR, June 29, 2016.
“…Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.
An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.
As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions at the expense of others could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And, as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI….”
LikeLike