Science Fraud & Fantasy (part 4)

What are the details? What are your conclusions?

Two loaded questions, the very first questions most folks ask.

The devils are in the details, the gods in the conclusion. I prefer not to entertain either.

I committed to knowing in the most thorough way, through intuition and reason, the heart and the mind, combined.

But, let me play a god for a spell, why not, it’s such a popular role these days. I’ve told you in advance, so you understand your role too. Your acquiesce, in essence, to this game.

This post is about frustration. I know you need saving, and I can’t save you.

I say this to our land, to the trees here, to some friends, to the universe at large.

There is nearly non-stop air traffic over my head in our rural location, but now several weeks of unprecedented cloud cover make it impossible to see what sort of aircraft are up there.

Nearly the entire month has been overcast, but with very little rain at all. There have been some odd mists on occasion that make me sneeze. The temperatures are expected to shift by 50 degrees in a day once again this weekend. The winds for this front are just picking up–I started a fire against the chill a few hours ago, now I have the windows open, and by tomorrow at this time it will be frigid. That’s what’s been scheduled so far anyway.

“Four seasons in a day.” Where have I heard that before?

The “media” tells me this is “normal”. The very word “normal” is starting to make me very agitated.

Try to find answers to this “normal”, please. Then maybe I will have one more serious person to talk to. Otherwise, spare me, I’d rather talk to the squirrels.

And try to notice the daggers I’m sending through my eyes the next time I hear the word “normal” from anyone.

Q: “Why don’t you send up a drone and get “contrail” samples so we can trust this is not just conspiracy theory?”

A: “Why don’t you get off the internet for a few hours a day to notice the actual world and what’s happening right over your head?”

Q: “OK, so I see these aren’t contrails, but what am I supposed to do about it?”

A: “Something. Anything. Just not the nothing you are currently doing.”

This week’s bread crumbs, science or faith, you’re still missing the point. Please try to pardon my attitude.

What’s the truth you are unwilling, unable to see?  If you can’t handle the truth, if you can’t handle even speculation, what the hell are you doing here?

This week’s bread crumbs:

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/12/06/manufacturing-normality/

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-12/scientists-want-to-give-the-atmosphere-an-antacid-to-relieve-climate-change

Space Fence theory of Elana Freeland–this is where it’s at!  I will be studying much more of this immediately!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0wPQ5VH

Same old, different day.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/fortune-500-goes-farming-nestle-monsanto-pepsico-et-al-the-grow-disaster-destroying-family-farms-worldwide/5562595

An old one but still good one, what are the premises on which we are basing our science, do they hold up to reality?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TerTgDEgUE
Rupert Sheldrake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFWyaCCQFC0&list=WL&index=32
an interesting one on ‘missing link’ frauds.

As a matter of interest to some perhaps, I’m also reading the Bible, a Masonic King James version.  I’m often surprisingly inspired by some Bible quotes that get thrown about in popular culture, yet so far all I’ve read about is war and how to prepare for it, and accept it.  I’ll spare y’all the direct lines this time around, but I expect we’ll have some fun with them later!  🙂

In case there are a few out there ready for the spinning barrel ride, you know the one, where the bottom drops out?!

Crrow777
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCW4k9vXjgOSDcYq6Ge9hWWg

Dark Journalist
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqOdHprLVQnHhE8FmIY3Yzg

These definitely file under the establishment’s “fake news” beware you will be tagged.

Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas.”
— Joseph Stalin

twowolves

 

Science Fraud and Fantasy (part 3)

I realize there is a war between the so-called “climate deniers” and the ‘global climate change’ enthusiasts and that both sides are trying to defend their positions with science. I am also trying to get my head around this science and following both sides of the argument and it is a heated argument indeed.

What makes me curious is why does such a complicated argument only seem to have two sides. Already this is a red flag for me. No complex issue has only two sides. If the Empire is using an ‘either/or’, it’s black or it’s white, it’s right or it’s left, they are trying to frame the conversation and stir up oppositional debate that is a diversion from the real issues.  Climate change is real or climate change is a hoax, that’s the limits of the discussion. You are for, or you are against.  You are with us, or you are with the terrorists.  The entire public conversation is rife with fallacies and emotional triggers on both sides.

Lord Monckton calls himself “an outsider” in climate science, though he’s been publishing on the topic since 2011. He says he has made a breakthrough, a simple arithmetic error, that will prove once and for all we have nothing to worry about climate change at all. Poof! A simple math problem in the models! We’ve been throwing money and expertise at this problem for decades based on a simple math error. Oh well. We can move on now, thank heavens. Isn’t science wonderful!  He makes sure to sprinkle in some good digs for those who are sure to disagree with his refined models, those “bed wetters” and “profiteers of doom.” 

What’s left out of the various infomercials-called-interviews he gives, like this one with Stefan Molyneux, is the most important part, the context. In fact, the essence, the very relevance for us average Joes and Janes. 

What’s most to fear is Environmental Totalitarianism, he cries!  What he leaves out is that this is what both sides want, they just have differing ways of taking us there.  The real problem, he declares, is those who haven’t learned logic and critical thinking. He repeatedly insists the scientists are following party lines, then proceeds to make all the science about politics.  For or against. Color inside the lines, citizen-cum-consumer.

What about the spraying campaigns, Your Lordship? When can we expect the Solar Radiation Management programs, and the Stratospheric Aerosol Injection procedures, and the other various Weather as Force Multiplier missions the military has been cooking up globally for over a decade, when might we expect those to end based on your new models? You know which ones I’m referring to, surely

I can imagine Lord Monckton’s reply. “No, you are quite mistaken, those are only proposed projects.”

And I am Alice in Wonderland fallen into a time warp, apparently.

All the now well-documented programs the scientific community keeps saying are a conspiracy theory, while the data compiled by now hundreds of thousands of “average” folks around the globe more than suggests otherwise.  

It sounds to me, your Lordship, like you might be suggesting they’ve been experimenting with our weather for decades for no good reason at all!  And that maybe the major global corporations like Weathermodification, Inc., will soon be going out of business?  Could it be?!  Do you suppose their vast number of global clients know this yet?  What about the curious spike in aluminum futures, might that have something to do with your new findings?

“Weather modification is not the same as climate engineering,” the good Lord might stammer.

Really?

What the scientists and the Empire want us to do is ignore our own sensory data. Ignore what your eyes are seeing, ignore what your ears are hearing, and stop saying anything we don’t want you to say.  It’s all hoaxes and conspiracy theories, if and until we say otherwise.

As I committed in part two, I will take no man at his word, still some men I trust more than others. I especially tend to trust more the ones who repeat continually, ‘don’t listen to me, do your own research!‘ Like Dane Wiggington at Geoengineeringwatch.org. I follow-up on his claims, I’ve studied his site, clicked on some of the patent links, and listened to every one of his presentations and weekly radio shows. I do not take him at his word, but I listen and I see where it aligns with my own sense data.

What do I know, beyond what anyone tells me, beyond any guru, beyond any faith, beyond any miracles of science or gods, news reports or military propaganda?

These observations did not take any formal training in logic or critical thinking, go figure!

–the weather in my area has gotten warmer over the last five years, based on my own records, and there are more days with 40-50 degree temperature shifts within very short periods.

winter has gotten shorter and more mild in my area, based on my own experience.  The leaves are not falling off the trees as much, but rather dying while still on the branches, this is not typical here.

the weather FEELS hotter, to my body.  The thermometer reads higher temperatures consistently by 20 or 30 degrees compared to normal the last couple years, and rather than building fires in the woodstove this time of year, I have all the windows open and the fans on, and I’m still hot. Due to the fact that the thermometer corroborates my feelings, I do not think this to be the onset of menopause.

–the pond is not full as often and the creek is lower and floods the banks less often, according to the input of my two eyeballs.

–the plants are not well-adapted to these shifts or something else happening in tandem. Gardening over the last few years has become more unpredictable. Many of the plants that normally thrive this time of year look “scalded” or something, which became worse after the last rain.  It seems to me the plants do not look happy. (omg, so unscientific!)

–the clouds are very different sometimes, they look different and don’t behave as the clouds of my youth (NASA brags about some of them as brilliant man-made clouds, I think they are gross, but that’s just my preference).

–there is SIGNIFICANTLY more air traffic over our rural area on certain days and in certain seasons. By significantly I mean from zero flights for many days and suddenly flights non-stop for days.  This is based on auditory and sometimes visual data of my own mind-body.

–the “contrails” of some of this air traffic do not look or behave as normal contrails, they do not dissipate, rather they expand, and eventually turn the sky a milky or hazy shade of very pale blue or silvery-white, occassionally turning irridescent in spots. I have taken many photos and they look like the photos I see online that “conspiracy theorists” are calling “chemtrails.” When I respond with my direct experiences, what I see and hear above my own head, I’m often told I’m crazy and/or irrational.

expandingtrail
These “man made clouds” made by planes eventually covered the sky this day, though the temperature was over 80 degrees and fairly low humidity, making low hanging condensation trails SCIENTIFICALLY impossible.

 

They don’t “believe” in chemtrails or geo-engineering. They equate it with saying one has seen Bigfoot. Why? Because science says they do not exist. They are contrails, period, end of story. Stop being irrational!

The reason I, and many of us trying to find out the truth, become so passionate and often excessively agitated when we discuss this topic is because many scientists and loads of average folks blindly following them are asking us to ignore our own sensory data. They want us to turn a blind eye to our own knowing and believe what the scientists and media are telling us, or that science will save us, and that the truth will prevail, that we should all have faith in the scientific method.

Isn’t empirical evidence supposed to mean data gathered by one’s own senses?  And yet, unless the Empire is the one dishing out such evidence it’s not really empirical evidence at all, it would seem.

Climate science sounds remarkably like religion, so it should be expected that there are those of us who will continue to address it with a certain fervor.

The Monckton-Molyneux infomercial noted above ends with these prophetic words, further cementing the “us vs them” social programming:

“It’s very difficult to get the truth out.  Am I gloomy?  No! Because we have the one thing they haven’t got . . .We have the truth and if we have the truth we have everything and they have nothing, and in due course the truth will assert itself as it always does.”

Molyneux replies with enthusiastic vows to do his very best and concludes, . . .to get more of the Lord’s work, visit . . .”

And I’m Alice in Wonderland again.

This week’s breadcrumbs:

Scientific American mag: geoengineering-could-turn-skies-white: “Efforts to reflect away the sun’s rays might also make the sky whiter, one of many reasons some distrust such geoengineering schemes.” By Lauren Morello, ClimateWire on June 1, 2012

Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTxvWLrUeE8

Geoengineering watch weekly podcast
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3F6XMH9Tqqo

Any physics experts out there who might help us make heads or tails of this paper?

http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/4191/2016/

How do we get our “experts” to speak publically about the real issues we’re facing, like a vastly growing number of us are damn sick of being treated like Guinea pigs?

This is why I will continue to say science is failing us, and I will continue to do so until I can prove otherwise.

experiment-guinea-pigs-crop.jpg

 

 

 

 

Science Fraud and Fantasy (part 1)

One of my favorite trees, the Sassafras, is flaming red now, one of the few to have changed so brilliantly in this unusually warm and dry fall in East Texas. Between now and winter is the best time to clip the leaves and dig up the tenacious roots so as to indulge in a couple of our ancestors’ favorite libations—root beer and Sassafras tea. Gumbo filé is also made from it, which is an essential ingredient in some Cajun cooking.

Our ancestors adored it, science calls it a carcinogen. At the same time vast groves of it are grown in regions of the globe more easily controlled, in order to mass extract their saffrole to make a version of the popular street drug called ecstasy.

Science is failing us. The case could be made in multiple disciplines, but can be witnessed most dramatically in plant/nutrition science, climate science, and quantum physics. It has become impossible over the last several decades to decipher the spin from the pseudo, the beneficial from the political, the real data and relevant studies from the marketing groups and the string-pullers.

Science has become reliant on disinformation and dogma, and driven almost entirely by warfare, which I’ll be discussing in the next several posts.

Climate engineering, including its many different angles like Stratospheric Aerosols, global dimming, Solar Radiation Management, etc. remains a topic so controversial among scientists even regular folks are starting to not believe their own eyes. They still question whether the expanding contrails above their heads and obvious to millions are even real. Trolls on social media claim ridiculous “scientific facts” that these trails and the chemical clouds and weather manipulation that ensues are totally normal. The scientific “community” is itself in denial, though the military has published multiple reports on these projects and it is discussed openly in think tanks, not to mention by millions on social media around the globe.

Here are some above our property, discussed in previous posts.

https://kenshohomestead.org/2016/10/12/greenwashing-the-globe/

https://kenshohomestead.org/2016/10/03/chemglobe/

Scientific analysis, from those few scientists who are bothering to question beyond the mainstream narrative, is interspersed with language of the alien agenda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjzkEiO6AAc(recent chemtrails analysis, but who is to know at this point who is really using science!)

We have been trained to believe science and faith are opposites. Yet, the push in modern science is to unify these polarities in a similar way as the alchemists once did.

Jay Dyer deconstructs at length various films, especially sci-fi, including the newly released Dr. Strange, through the lens of the occult and the Ecumenical movement. Like in so many Hollywood films, we witness the marriage of science and spirituality, move effortlessly between these two ‘opposing’ worldviews, with “magic” and “science” having become once again interchangeable. While some may argue this is just fiction, a deeper study of fiction will quickly blur those thin lines. “Unity consciousness” is all-pervasive in some circles, especially among those New Age folks who consider themselves “enlightened” and these popular movements are influenced by the same worldview permeating science.

https://www.spreaker.com/user/acrnetwork/doctor-strange-illuminism-mans-apotheosi

Scientism is the result, Jay argues.

https://jaysanalysis.com/2014/06/17/the-cult-of-scientism-and-nikola-teslas-aether/

Such is the mythology surrounding scientism, and its incorrect narrative of how history has progressed and how the scientific method is the only reliable, all-encompassing Rosetta Stone of gnosis. In reality, the global standardized university system is an epistemic cartel dogmatically committed to enforcing naïve empiricism and reductionist materialism, as well as centuries old, outdated “mass consumption” physics. Granted, not every “scientist” is party to this conspiracy, but without a doubt, no one graduates to international prominence without passing the qualifications of the Royal Society’s Holy Office of scientific inquisition. Nikola Tesla and his classified and confiscated work is a perfect example of this international materialist/monetarist control – but more on that later. . . .Yet so many operate under the assumption that funding and desired results somehow doesn’t determine the results of what studies get funded and are done! This is not to say all studies are funded for a specific purpose, but nowadays, almost everyone is familiar with the practice of certain megacorporations funding studies to achieve profitable results. Notable, famous examples of this include the pharmaceutical and GMO food industries. Failing to recognize this fact is simply not living in the real world, opting instead for the fantasy land of imagined objectivity for one special field, “science,” as if science were magically immune to the rest of human weakness.”

“Almost the entire academic world has, for centuries, been under the delusion that the “scientific method” is the best and only reliable means for arriving at an approximation of the natural world. Religion, speculation, emotions, etc., are all lumped into a similar dustbin, giving us no useful data relevant to science. Science, the argument goes, relies on some amorphous form of “reason” (though none of these pragmatists have any idea what exactly reason itself is), that provides us with calculable, generally mathematical results.”

http://www.blacklistednews.com/40_percent_of_scientists_admit_that_fraud_is_always_or_often_a_factor_that_contributes_to_irreproducible_research/51518/0/38/38/Y/M.html

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/sep/13/scientific-research-fraud-bad-practice

Lots of science fraud has been uncovered by veteran journalist Jon Rappoport concerning disease. For example: declaring and promoting the existence of various epidemics, when the viruses purportedly causing them are not proven to exist or not proven to cause human illness (Zika, Ebola, SARS, West Nile, Swine Flu, etc.)https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/category/science-fraud/

http://news.stanford.edu/2015/11/16/fraud-science-papers-111615/

Where to even begin considering the faulty “progress” of nutrition science? With GMOs, of course!

http://modernfarmer.com/2016/10/wait-second-gmo-crops-dont-actually-reduce-pesticide-use-produce-food/

The “thinking” folk, the so-called rational ones, often try to distance themselves from those of faith. A Facebook friend recently made an astute comment when I wrote of my intention to question science.

“Science is the tool. Scientists are the craftsmen. There is definitely a difference between a carpenter and the hammer he uses to perform his trade. If he builds shoddy structures that collapse with the first moderate breeze, was it the fault of the hammer, or the one wielding it?”

Let’s take the analogy one step further. Considering it’s obvious that fraud and fantasy are embedded in the reality of these scientific craftsmen, how useful can we really consider the tool to be?  As the old adage goes, when all you have is a hammer, everything becomes a nail.

To be continued . . .