“Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater!” If only I had a dollar for every time I’ve heard this adage. Certainly that is not my intention and I don’t mean to dismiss all of science or mistrust all the experts.
The challenge I’m having is finding the baby in all that filthy bathwater. I’m tired of being lied to and preached at by experts. I realize many of them are well-meaning and some must surely be trustworthy. But then, if that’s truly the case, why are they not more critical of their professions and those in their professions who are spreading so much arrogance and disinformation? I left my teaching career because I could no longer tolerate my colleagues who were blindly following any orders from an administration who cared nothing at all about education. This is what happens when business and politics trump all other endeavors, no matter what the profession or institution.
I made a mistake in my last post, grouping the work of Michael Tsarion with the shell gamers. Perhaps I was wrong, again. In fact, my instinct is telling me he might very well be one of the decent ones navigating filthy waters. I’ll continue to support his work until I’m certain it’s no longer of value to me.
I am beginning to perceive the roots of the issue. It’s greater than greed in business; it’s deeper than the drug of power; it’s more complicated than the relationship between authority and submission. I’m not quite ready to formulate it in words yet, but it’s based in illusion and denial, our willingness to accept it and our propensity to create it. Maybe that’s already obvious to many, but still I need to reason it out for myself.
How could we expect it to be any different? We raise our children to believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy. We remove them from the natural world to sit in a room all day and learn about the unnatural world, the socially-constructed world–to memorize what men were their presidents and who won which wars on which days and various sciences full of lies. What a waste of precious time it is! Is it any wonder why so few seem to have any respect for nature and reality?!
What irritates me beyond measure is to read and hear lies and half-truths sold by the media to an uninformed and unobservant public about crucial issues that affect us all, like geo-engineering. To all those who are complicit in this shell game, may the shame of your actions haunt you for your lifetime. I don’t care what your good intentions are or aren’t, this is psychic torture y’all are perpetrating, along with the rape and pillage of our beautiful lands, seas and airs.
I blame the media, I blame the scientists and technocrats and politicians who are complicit or turning a blind eye, I blame those still not paying attention in the still-complacent public. And the next time some guru tries to tell me (again) to look in the mirror, meditate, or focus inward– I’m going to respond with a litany of expletives that would make a sailor blush.
Shame on you LIARS at Bloomberg–to pretend geoengineering isn’t already happening on a mass scale! I see through your reverse-engineering and social conditioning and demonic double-speak.
Here’s the good news, though I don’t know who in the universe to give credit where such credit is due: I retrieved our precious pooch from the wild side.
Was there some Law of Attraction happening there, as I challenged in my last post? I can’t really say, but it makes for a great story. I found him with a pack of dogs, half of them feral. He was injured, limping and highly disoriented. I am still bringing him back to health, slowly. I am bursting with joy he is home, in any case.
Here’s the bad news. Geoengineering is the greatest shell game on earth. It’s a Psy-Op Supreme with all the fixings, being carried out from the very top of the pyramid with far more angles and rabbit holes, trolls and shills than anyone I’ve heard speaking about it cares to admit. It’s a cesspool of cons, collaborators and deniers, just like vaccines.
I am loathe to admit I have also been a loser in this shell game, but I’m starting to get better at it. For starters, I trust NO ONE now. I’ve been a fool, as I started out saying with this series of posts, on a fool’s journey. I’ve supported, in word and even with our hard-earned dollars, some of the very people I now find highly suspect. I will refrain from naming names at the moment, since I have no proof and no desire to slander, but do know I’m watching them all now with far more critical eyes.
I will retract one thing directly I said in just the last post, I will not be studying the work of Michael Tsarion with any more depth, it’s a dead end. I can add him to the growing list along with Stefan Molyneux, Alan Watt, Alex Jones, and several other shell gamers on whom I once wasted time. I now recognize ‘the scent’ of these players; I can hear their NLP tricks (neuro-linguistic programming); I can see their ‘cult of personality’ following and I am out of their loops.
Still, I’m not saying they don’t have some good tidbits to consume, they certainly do, otherwise they would not be where they are. For example, I think Michael Tsarion has some crucial advice about self-empowerment and his work about ‘psychic vampirism’ has helped me understand some of the nature of evil, how to recognize it and to root it out of my own life. His work in mythology and ancient history is also compelling, but lots of folks are doing compelling work in these fields and arriving at far different conclusions. The conclusions these folks are making is where the issue lies.
For example this fascinating researcher who looks like she’s doing some fabulous work debunking the sciences of anthropology and archeology. She’s turned me on to my new favorite word: Quackademics! Now that’s funny! And it’s so true, I can say that after spending over twenty years in the system—the number of blind order-followers there must surely rival the best armies. I listen for her data, her conclusions ring false to me, like all the others. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk-o42NNQm4&t=63s
“The truth is precious. It is sad that there are so many in our society who have lost respect for it; people who have traded in their conscience and their soul for temporary financial comfort while sacrificing the stability and balance of the rest of the country in the process. The human psyche breathes on the air of truth. Without it, humanity cannot survive. Without it, the species will collapse, starving from lack of intellectual and emotional sustenance.” Tyler Durden http://www.zerohedge.com/news/disinformation-how-it-works
It’s not just sad, it’s devastating and disgusting. These aren’t just little white lies to keep from hurting someone’s feelings; these are blatant and brutal attacks on sanity and consciousness and nature.
From 80 degrees when I went to bed, to icicles when I woke up in the morning. The mainstream weathermen give this incredible shift some ridiculous new name so we think it’s ‘normal’ or at least ‘normalish’. What I do know, without any doubt is, our ancestors could never have survived with such rapid and regular temperature extremes. If the plants don’t like it, it’s not normal.
Last night I had a nightmare, very short but very vivid. I was looking at a red-headed young girl standing in a corner. She had quite a blank expression and I don’t think I knew her. I approached her with my hands outstretched and said “I’m going to kill you!” I took a step forward, as if I was going to strangle her, it was like something right out of a bad movie, and I felt in that moment like I was an actor, and she looked back at me as if she knew I was acting. Then I suddenly had a gripping dread come over me for a second, like I was being smothered by an immense force across my chest, and that woke me up. I was breathless and terrified.
I have often had intense dreams, as long as I can remember. I’ve even had a couple of ‘prophetic’ dreams. Not too long ago, when I first started working with the Tarot cards, I dreamt of the Star card, then drew that card three times in a row. I have often wondered what wisdom lies just beneath the surface of our consciousness, what is imagination exactly, what creates moments of seemingly unbelievable synchronicity? How are the ‘breadcrumbs’ of these ‘little’ things influencing my life and choices?
Maybe you’re thinking now, what on earth does any of this hoo-ha have to do with science? I would suggest if that’s what you are thinking to begin with the works of Jon Ronson, including of course his very popular Men Who Stare at Goats. I would especially advise reading his work after you’ve read “The Art of War” by Sun Tzu. All warfare is based on deception. The purpose of war is peace. The goal is to win without ever needing to fight.
Our entire fields of science and technology have developed out of creating better weapons. Better weapons to spy, better weapons to fight.
Here’s just a short list of why I don’t trust scientists.
–The Manhattan Project –MK Ultra –Testicular transplant experimentation on 500 prisoners at San Quentin –The Holocaust experimentation –forced sterilization of Carrie Buck –Rockefeller Institute Rhoads cancer experiments on Puerto Ricans –Tuskegee syphilis experiments –Atomic Energy Commission “Green Run”. –Hepatitis vaccine experiments on the mentally disabled. –Human Radiation Experiments
I could go on and on, but thanks to John Hall, I’ll point you to his book: Guinea Pigs: Technologies of Control.
I am very committed at the moment to explore all the work of Michael Tsarion. I’ve been dabbling in it for several years, but I turn to it with a new level of commitment now. I trust him more than many others for the specific reason mentioned a few posts ago—those who emplore me to do my own research, and provide the framework for me to do that, deserve far more consideration than those who do not.
I deeply align with and appreciate the vast scope of his work, bringing ancient subjects into immediate worldly relevance, as in this recent recording about pyschic vampirism (aka: extreme narcissism).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPb-4W0mA_k
What resonates so much with me about his work right now is his consistent focus on providing the ‘building blocks’ as he says—he works in the wisdom of the origins because from it we can ourselves become empowered by them and rebuild culture with them.
“It’s not about handing out solutions,” he says. I couldn’t agree more. Solutions are useless in the hands of a mankind without the skills and capacities to use them. This is a fundamental truth it seems the New Age movement is trying to hijack and reframe for the masses and I deeply mistrust anyone trying to push proverbial lodestones. And that goes for ‘real’ ones too.
One of our dog is missing now for over 24 hours. I’m quite attached to this old hooligan. Let’s test “The Secret” theory, the Law of Attraction as it’s being sold by The Shift and other New Age nonsense. I’ve already been imagining him returning to us safely, for about 12 hours now. Every hour, I imagine it with all the love and care and gushing which comes quite easily to me. I am imagining it over and over, how I adore him, how I love even his quirks and sassiness and can’t wait to hug him again and cook him his favorite eggs and chicken supper. And how funny and expressive his different gestures are, and how he likes to sneeze on us in the morning in bed, and nuzzle up and snore and snortly loudly with delightful abandon.
OK, universe, now deliver him back to me. I’m waiting with great intention.
In the meantime, a not-to-be-missed presentation by Dane Wigington about the immense harms being caused to our environment by geo-engineering.
Two loaded questions, the very first questions most folks ask.
The devils are in the details, the gods in the conclusion. I prefer not to entertain either.
I committed to knowing in the most thorough way, through intuition and reason, the heart and the mind, combined.
But, let me play a god for a spell, why not, it’s such a popular role these days. I’ve told you in advance, so you understand your role too. Your acquiesce, in essence, to this game.
This post is about frustration. I know you need saving, and I can’t save you.
I say this to our land, to the trees here, to some friends, to the universe at large.
There is nearly non-stop air traffic over my head in our rural location, but now several weeks of unprecedented cloud cover make it impossible to see what sort of aircraft are up there.
Nearly the entire month has been overcast, but with very little rain at all. There have been some odd mists on occasion that make me sneeze. The temperatures are expected to shift by 50 degrees in a day once again this weekend. The winds for this front are just picking up–I started a fire against the chill a few hours ago, now I have the windows open, and by tomorrow at this time it will be frigid. That’s what’s been scheduled so far anyway.
“Four seasons in a day.” Where have I heard that before?
The “media” tells me this is “normal”. The very word “normal” is starting to make me very agitated.
Try to find answers to this “normal”, please. Then maybe I will have one more serious person to talk to. Otherwise, spare me, I’d rather talk to the squirrels.
And try to notice the daggers I’m sending through my eyes the next time I hear the word “normal” from anyone.
Q: “Why don’t you send up a drone and get “contrail” samples so we can trust this is not just conspiracy theory?”
A: “Why don’t you get off the internet for a few hours a day to notice the actual world and what’s happening right over your head?”
Q: “OK, so I see these aren’t contrails, but what am I supposed to do about it?”
A: “Something. Anything. Just not the nothingyou are currently doing.”
This week’s bread crumbs, science or faith, you’re still missing the point. Please try to pardon my attitude.
What’s the truth you are unwilling, unable to see? If you can’t handle the truth, if you can’t handle even speculation, what the hell are you doing here?
As a matter of interest to some perhaps, I’m also reading the Bible, a Masonic King James version. I’m often surprisingly inspired by some Bible quotes that get thrown about in popular culture, yet so far all I’ve read about is war and how to prepare for it, and accept it. I’ll spare y’all the direct lines this time around, but I expect we’ll have some fun with them later! 🙂
In case there are a few out there ready for the spinning barrel ride, you know the one, where the bottom drops out?!
I realize there is a war between the so-called “climate deniers” and the ‘global climate change’ enthusiasts and that both sides are trying to defend their positions with science. I am also trying to get my head around this science and following both sides of the argument and it is a heated argument indeed.
What makes me curious is why does such a complicated argument only seem to have two sides. Already this is a red flag for me. No complex issue has only two sides. If the Empire is using an ‘either/or’, it’s black or it’s white, it’s right or it’s left, they are trying to frame the conversation and stir up oppositional debate that is a diversion from the real issues. Climate change is real or climate change is a hoax, that’s the limits of the discussion. You are for, or you are against. You are with us, or you are with the terrorists. The entire public conversation is rife with fallacies and emotional triggers on both sides.
Lord Monckton calls himself “an outsider” in climate science, though he’s been publishing on the topic since 2011. He says he has made a breakthrough, a simple arithmetic error, that will prove once and for all we have nothing to worry about climate change at all. Poof! A simple math problem in the models! We’ve been throwing money and expertise at this problem for decades based on a simple math error. Oh well. We can move on now, thank heavens. Isn’t science wonderful! He makes sure to sprinkle in some good digs for those who are sure to disagree with his refined models, those “bed wetters” and “profiteers of doom.”
What’s left out of the various infomercials-called-interviews he gives, like this one with Stefan Molyneux, is the most important part, the context. In fact, the essence, the very relevance for us average Joes and Janes.
What’s most to fear is Environmental Totalitarianism, he cries! What he leaves out is that this is what both sides want, they just have differing ways of taking us there. The real problem, he declares, is those who haven’t learned logic and critical thinking. He repeatedly insists the scientists are following party lines, then proceeds to make all the science about politics. For or against. Color inside the lines, citizen-cum-consumer.
What about the spraying campaigns, Your Lordship? When can we expect the Solar Radiation Management programs, and the Stratospheric AerosolInjection procedures, and the other various Weather as Force Multiplier missions the military has been cooking up globally for over a decade, when might we expect those to end based on your new models? You know which ones I’m referring to, surely!
I can imagine Lord Monckton’s reply. “No, you are quite mistaken, those are only proposed projects.”
And I am Alice in Wonderland fallen into a time warp, apparently.
All the now well-documented programs the scientific community keeps saying are a conspiracy theory, while the data compiled by now hundreds of thousands of “average” folks around the globe more than suggests otherwise.
It sounds to me, your Lordship, like you might be suggesting they’ve been experimenting with our weather for decades for no good reason at all! And that maybe the major global corporations like Weathermodification, Inc., will soon be going out of business? Could it be?! Do you suppose their vast number of global clients know this yet? What about the curious spike in aluminum futures, might that have something to do with your new findings?
“Weather modification is not the same as climate engineering,” the good Lord might stammer.
What the scientists and the Empire want us to do is ignore our own sensory data. Ignore what your eyes are seeing, ignore what your ears are hearing, and stop saying anything we don’t want you to say. It’s all hoaxes and conspiracy theories, if and until we say otherwise.
As I committed in part two, I will take no man at his word, still some men I trust more than others. I especially tend to trust more the ones who repeat continually, ‘don’t listen to me, do your own research!‘ Like Dane Wiggington at Geoengineeringwatch.org. I follow-up on his claims, I’ve studied his site, clicked on some of the patent links, and listened to every one of his presentations and weekly radio shows. I do not take him at his word, but I listen and I see where it aligns with my own sense data.
What do I know, beyond what anyone tells me, beyond any guru, beyond any faith, beyond any miracles of science or gods, news reports or military propaganda?
These observations did not take any formal training in logic or critical thinking, go figure!
–the weather in my area has gotten warmer over the last five years, based on my own records, and there are more days with 40-50 degree temperature shifts within very short periods.
—winter has gotten shorter and more mild in my area, based on my own experience. The leaves are not falling off the trees as much, but rather dying while still on the branches, this is not typical here.
—the weather FEELS hotter, to my body. The thermometer reads higher temperatures consistently by 20 or 30 degrees compared to normal the last couple years, and rather than building fires in the woodstove this time of year, I have all the windows open and the fans on, and I’m still hot. Due to the fact that the thermometer corroborates my feelings, I do not think this to be the onset of menopause.
–the pond is not full as often and the creek is lower and floods the banks less often, according to the input of my two eyeballs.
–the plants are not well-adapted to these shifts or something else happening in tandem. Gardening over the last few years has become more unpredictable. Many of the plants that normally thrive this time of year look “scalded” or something, which became worse after the last rain. It seems to me the plants do not look happy. (omg, so unscientific!)
–the clouds are very different sometimes, they look different and don’t behave as the clouds of my youth (NASA brags about some of them as brilliant man-made clouds, I think they are gross, but that’s just my preference).
–there is SIGNIFICANTLY more air traffic over our rural area on certain days and in certain seasons. By significantly I mean from zero flights for many days and suddenly flights non-stop for days. This is based on auditory and sometimes visual data of my own mind-body.
–the “contrails” of some of this air traffic do not look or behave as normal contrails, they do not dissipate, rather they expand, and eventually turn the sky a milky or hazy shade of very pale blue or silvery-white, occassionally turning irridescent in spots. I have taken many photos and they look like the photos I see online that “conspiracy theorists” are calling “chemtrails.” When I respond with my direct experiences, what I see and hear above my own head, I’m often told I’m crazy and/or irrational.
They don’t “believe” in chemtrails or geo-engineering. They equate it with saying one has seen Bigfoot. Why? Because science says they do not exist. They are contrails, period, end of story. Stop being irrational!
The reason I, and many of us trying to find out the truth, become so passionate and often excessively agitated when we discuss this topic is because many scientists and loads of average folks blindly following them are asking us to ignore our own sensory data. They want us to turn a blind eye to our own knowing and believe what the scientists and media are telling us, or that science will save us, and that the truth will prevail, that we should all have faith in the scientific method.
Isn’t empirical evidence supposed to mean data gathered by one’s own senses? And yet, unless the Empire is the one dishing out such evidence it’s not really empirical evidence at all, it would seem.
Climate science sounds remarkably like religion, so it should be expected that there are those of us who will continue to address it with a certain fervor.
The Monckton-Molyneux infomercial noted above ends with these prophetic words, further cementing the “us vs them” social programming:
“It’s very difficult to get the truth out. Am I gloomy? No! Because we have the one thing they haven’t got . . .We have the truth and if we have the truth we have everything and they have nothing, and in due course the truth will assert itself as it always does.”
Molyneux replies with enthusiastic vows to do his very best and concludes, . . .to get more of the Lord’s work, visit . . .”
One of my favorite trees, the Sassafras, is flaming red now, one of the few to have changed so brilliantly in this unusually warm and dry fall in East Texas. Between now and winter is the best time to clip the leaves and dig up the tenacious roots so as to indulge in a couple of our ancestors’ favorite libations—root beer and Sassafras tea. Gumbo filé is also made from it, which is an essential ingredient in some Cajun cooking.
Our ancestors adored it, science calls it a carcinogen. At the same time vast groves of it are grown in regions of the globe more easily controlled, in order to mass extract their saffrole to make a version of the popular street drug called ecstasy.
Science is failing us. The case could be made in multiple disciplines, but can be witnessed most dramatically in plant/nutrition science, climate science, and quantum physics. It has become impossible over the last several decades to decipher the spin from the pseudo, the beneficial from the political, the real data and relevant studies from the marketing groups and the string-pullers.
Science has become reliant on disinformation and dogma, and driven almost entirely by warfare, which I’ll be discussing in the next several posts.
Climate engineering, including its many different angles like Stratospheric Aerosols, global dimming, Solar Radiation Management, etc. remains a topic so controversial among scientists even regular folks are starting to not believe their own eyes. They still question whether the expanding contrails above their heads and obvious to millions are even real. Trolls on social media claim ridiculous “scientific facts” that these trails and the chemical clouds and weather manipulation that ensues are totally normal. The scientific “community” is itself in denial, though the military has published multiple reports on these projects and it is discussed openly in think tanks, not to mention by millions on social media around the globe.
Here are some above our property, discussed in previous posts.
Scientific analysis, from those few scientists who are bothering to question beyond the mainstream narrative, is interspersed with language of the alienagenda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjzkEiO6AAc(recent chemtrails analysis, but who is to know at this point who is really using science!)
We have been trained to believe science and faith are opposites. Yet, the push in modern science is to unify these polarities in a similar way as the alchemists once did.
Jay Dyer deconstructs at length various films, especially sci-fi, including the newly released Dr. Strange, through the lens of the occult and the Ecumenical movement. Like in so many Hollywood films, we witness the marriage of science and spirituality, move effortlessly between these two ‘opposing’ worldviews, with “magic” and “science” having become once again interchangeable. While some may argue this is just fiction, a deeper study of fiction will quickly blur those thin lines. “Unity consciousness” is all-pervasive in some circles, especially among those New Age folks who consider themselves “enlightened” and these popular movements are influenced by the same worldview permeating science.
“Such is the mythology surrounding scientism, and its incorrect narrative of how history has progressed and how the scientific method is the only reliable, all-encompassing Rosetta Stone of gnosis. In reality, the global standardized university system is an epistemic cartel dogmatically committed to enforcing naïve empiricism and reductionist materialism, as well as centuries old, outdated “mass consumption” physics. Granted, not every “scientist” is party to this conspiracy, but without a doubt, no one graduates to international prominence without passing the qualifications of the Royal Society’s Holy Office of scientific inquisition. Nikola Tesla and his classified and confiscated work is a perfect example of this international materialist/monetarist control – but more on that later. . . .Yet so many operate under the assumption that funding and desired results somehow doesn’t determine the results of what studies get funded and are done! This is not to say all studies are funded for a specific purpose, but nowadays, almost everyone is familiar with the practice of certain megacorporations funding studies to achieve profitable results. Notable, famous examples of this include the pharmaceutical and GMO food industries. Failing to recognize this fact is simply not living in the real world, opting instead for the fantasy land of imagined objectivity for one special field, “science,” as if science were magically immune to the rest of human weakness.”
“Almost the entire academic world has, for centuries, been under the delusion that the “scientific method” is the best and only reliable means for arriving at an approximation of the natural world. Religion, speculation, emotions, etc., are all lumped into a similar dustbin, giving us no useful data relevant to science. Science, the argument goes, relies on some amorphous form of “reason” (though none of these pragmatists have any idea what exactly reason itself is), that provides us with calculable, generally mathematical results.”
Lots of science fraud has been uncovered by veteran journalist Jon Rappoport concerning disease. For example: declaring and promoting the existence of various epidemics, when the viruses purportedly causing them are not proven to exist or not proven to cause human illness (Zika, Ebola, SARS, West Nile, Swine Flu, etc.)https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/category/science-fraud/
The “thinking” folk, the so-called rational ones, often try to distance themselves from those of faith. A Facebook friend recently made an astute comment when I wrote of my intention to question science.
“Science is the tool. Scientists are the craftsmen. There is definitely a difference between a carpenter and the hammer he uses to perform his trade. If he builds shoddy structures that collapse with the first moderate breeze, was it the fault of the hammer, or the one wielding it?”
Let’s take the analogy one step further. Considering it’s obvious that fraud and fantasy are embedded in the reality of these scientific craftsmen, how useful can we really consider the tool to be? As the old adage goes, when all you have is a hammer, everything becomes a nail.